Getting with it
The other day the following two sentences were brought up at a Framenet meeting:
- He used an electric mixer to make the cookies.
- He used an electric mixer to make the cookies with.
That last with really shouldn’t be there, I suppose, but it absolutely makes sense why [hmm...was that a legal sluice?]. Searching for this sort of sentence on Google isn’t exactly trivial (especially since their * wildcard does weird things, like allowing extra words in parts of the search string where the * isn’t located). But you can search for questions, and get things like this:
- What did you use to color it with? Just pens? If so, what type of pens?
(yes, there are many “usta” matches to most searches; but many are legit)
Freaky, man. But this is another case where preposition stranding is basically the only option. The same goes for where at and (an idiomatic sense of) what for.
- Where did you audition at?
- ?? At where did you audition?
- What did you do that for?
- ?? For what did you do that?
But more freaky: you get sentences like With what move did Shawn Michaels use to win the match?. Buh.
Comments(4)